GOLF COURSE PRESERVATION immediate call to action The gloves are off!

In our May 22 Post we announced the golf course owners filed a formal application with the county.  That’s our trigger to ACT NOW.  Here is the first step. You need to write personal letters to everyone involved in the application approval process.  Hard copy letters are most effective (no DELETE key), but email works as well.  The following PDF contains names and addresses of people you should write to.  If you can think of others to add, please use the “Contact Us” page on the BLOG and we will add them to the list.

Please don’t put this off.  Your letters should be powerful, personal and call for action by the recipient.  Please do not send form letters or copy someone else’s.  Below are some suggestions for concerns you can discuss.  You may, of course, want to raise others not listed.  We suggest you limit your letter to three or four of your main interests.  Too much information can get lost on the reader.  Don’t be afraid to ask for a reply.

This BLOG probably reaches about 2/3 of our community.  We encourage you to contact your neighbors and, if the are not signed up, encourage them to do so. Ask them to write letters too. We are not limited to Morgan Creek.  If you know others outside the community in the greater Dry Creek area as well as users of the golf course, encourage then to sign up and write.

Here are some suggested topics in no particular order:

  • Morgan Creek, LLC’s application alleges golf is in significant decline and they are losing money.  Since 2020 and COVID there has been a surge in successful courses in the area.  Morgan creek is very busy and preferred tee times hard to get.  If you have any specific facts or statistics, lets cite them.
  • Homeowner values will likely decline significantly if the project is approved because…
  • Morgan Creek was permitted in the 1990’s after exhaustive review as a complete integrated project of open space, a golf course, and planned housing areas.  Its approval was based on maintaining this balance.  It must not be broken up.
  • The community not only serves Morgan Creek residents but was designed for public access to the open spaces including the golf course through numerous foot path and bike trails.
  • Additional housing and less maintenance on newly created open space could have an impact on the County designated riparian sanctuary along Dry Creek.
  • Newly released and poorly maintained open spaces can present an expanded fire hazard to existing homes.
  • Access to the proposed housing would be on our private roads, especially on the north side.  They were designed for the current traffic levels.  We don’t need more.

We will be rolling out many other mobilization efforts you can help with in the coming days and weeks.  Stay tuned.  But, for now, WRITE THOSE LETTERS.

As always, please leave comments.  Tell others what you are doing.  If we all pull together, we will succeed.

2 thoughts on “GOLF COURSE PRESERVATION immediate call to action The gloves are off!”

  1. Thank you for the update. One point I added to my letter that is not mentioned in your list is the addition of 14k homes that are already planned for development in the West Roseville area. All these new people will need outdoor recreation options so that is one more argument against closing the golf course.

  2. “The application was filed under Gov. Newsom’s recent bill, SB330, which is a fast-track approval for affordable housing in densely populated areas. With unimproved lots alone selling for around $200K plus this hardly should qualify.”

    Does this mean he is attempting to building “affordable housing?” Why is an application filed if it does not meet the requirement of “affordable housing?” Is it filed this way for Charlie to “look good” to the community in that he is serving the poor or is it filed this way to frighten us?

    Can the application be rejected on the fact that the development plan does not meet the standards of affordable housing?

    I posted prior to this post and it was removed. Who removed it? Why?

    Could the filing of the development proposal under SB300 be a hint at possible surprises to come? In other words, the homes start being built at the $600 – $700k range, but then the economy crashes or some other event happens which is used as an excuse to change the homes to lower cost homes? We are still only two weeks in to slow the spread, right? See what I mean. Something can start out innocent and become much more destructive later.

Leave a Reply